Robotics OEM Three Evidence Curves Public Brief v1
Date: 2026-06-11 Owner: Hugo / Genius Team Agent: Finance / Charlie AGT-002 Status: public-safe research artifact for Codex packaging Visibility: PUBLIC Related files:
knowledge/robotics-research-harness.mdknowledge/robotics-tesla-figure-unitree-slide-evidence-v1.mdknowledge/robotics-oem-public-evidence-matrix-v1.mdknowledge/robotics-public-claim-bank-v1.md
Public-safety: yes. No Hugo private portfolio data. No trade recommendation.
0. One-line answer
截至 2026-06-11,Tesla / Figure / Unitree 最适合公开表达成“三条证据曲线”,而不是三家公司排名:
- Tesla Optimus = capacity ambition / vertical integration curve:Fremont first-generation Optimus line designed for 1M robots/year;Texas second-generation line long-term designed annual capacity 10M robots。🟢 Tesla Q1 2026 Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, filed 2026-04-22.
- Figure AI = deployment KPI / manufacturing KPI curve:BMW Spartanburg 11-month deployment 披露 10-hour shifts Monday-Friday、90,000+ parts loaded、1,250+ runtime hours、contribution to 30,000+ BMW X3 vehicles;BotQ 披露 350+ Figure 03 delivered、cadence from 1/day to 1/hour、EOL first-pass yield >80%、battery-line first-pass yield 99.3%。🟢 Figure official posts, 2025-11-19 and 2026-04-29.
- Unitree / 宇树 = cost-access / developer-platform curve:R1 from US$4,900、G1 from US$13.5K、H2 US$29,900;H2 Plus / G1-D pages reference NVIDIA Jetson T5000, Isaac GR00T / TeleOp / Sim, and data / training workflows。🟢 Unitree official product pages, accessed 2026-06-10.
Current conclusion: the trio collectively shows stronger S3-S4 evidence than a demo-only cycle, but none publicly proves complete S5 scaled commercial economics yet: repeat paid deployment, customer ROI/payback, low intervention rate, actual output/yield, robot revenue, and robot gross margin remain missing or incomplete. 🟢/🟠 as of 2026-06-11.
1. Why this artifact exists
Existing files already contain thick evidence. Codex packaging risk is compression error:
- compressing Tesla's designed capacity into current production;
- compressing Figure's BMW KPI into complete unit economics;
- compressing Unitree's low price into reliability / gross margin proof;
- turning three different evidence types into a misleading winner ranking.
This brief gives Codex exact public-safe copy, slide structure, and caveats for the Tesla / Figure / Unitree comparison.
2. The three evidence curves
| Curve | Representative company | Best public evidence | Signal grade | What it proves | What it does NOT prove |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity ambition / vertical integration | Tesla Optimus | Fremont line designed for 1M robots/year; Texas line long-term designed annual capacity 10M robots. 🟢 Q1 2026 8-K, filed 2026-04-22 | S4 infrastructure / capacity-intent | Tesla is treating Optimus as a manufacturing-scale program, not only a lab demo. | Actual quarterly output, yield, utilization, robot revenue, gross margin, external paid customers, customer ROI/payback. |
| Deployment KPI / manufacturing KPI | Figure AI | BMW: 1,250+ runtime hours, 90,000+ parts loaded, 10-hour shifts Mon-Fri, 30,000+ X3 contribution. BotQ: 350+ Figure 03 delivered, 1/day to 1/hour cadence, >80% EOL FPY, 99.3% battery-line FPY. 🟢 2025-11-19 / 2026-04-29 | S4 deployment + manufacturing signal | Humanoid robots can be measured in real customer operations and Figure is disclosing production-process metrics. | Contract value, robot count by customer, customer-confirmed ROI/payback, repeat-order economics, intervention rate, gross margin. |
| Cost-access / developer-platform | Unitree / 宇树 | R1 from US$4,900; G1 from US$13.5K; H2 US$29,900; H2 Plus / G1-D official pages reference Jetson T5000, Isaac GR00T / TeleOp / Sim, data/training workflow. 🟢 accessed 2026-06-10 | S3/S4 cost-access + platform signal | Humanoid hardware access cost is falling enough to expand experimentation and developer adoption. | Industrial reliability, shipment volume, customer deployment KPI, uptime, margin, support cost, repeat orders, customer ROI/payback. |
3. Public-safe slide draft
Slide title
Tesla / Figure / Unitree: three evidence curves, not one horse race
Slide subtitle
Capacity ambition, deployment KPI, and cost-access curve answer different questions. None alone proves scaled commercial economics yet.
Main visual
What public evidence supports today
Tesla Optimus Figure AI Unitree / 宇树
Capacity ambition Deployment + manufacturing KPI Cost-access platform
1M Fremont designed line BMW: 1,250+ hours, 90k+ parts R1 $4.9k / G1 $13.5k
10M Texas long-term design BotQ: 350+ robots, >80% EOL FPY H2 $29.9k + dev stack
What is still missing before S5
Tesla: actual output, yield, external paid customer, robot revenue, gross margin.
Figure: contract value, customer-confirmed ROI, repeat orders, intervention rate, gross margin.
Unitree: deployment KPI, shipment volume, uptime/reliability, service cost, margin.
Required footer
Evidence map, not winner ranking. Designed capacity ≠ production; customer KPI ≠ full economics; low price ≠ reliability or margin.
4. Public site section draft
Section heading
三家公司,三种证据,不是一个排行榜
Body copy
Tesla、Figure、Unitree 经常被放在同一张 humanoid 对比图里,但它们当前公开证据回答的是三道不同问题。
Tesla 的核心信号是制造尺度意图:截至 Tesla Q1 2026 8-K,Fremont first-generation Optimus line 的设计产能是 1M robots/year,Texas second-generation line 的 long-term designed annual capacity 是 10M robots。这个证据很强,但它证明的是 infrastructure / capacity ambition,不是当前实际产量或外部客户经济性。🟢/🟠
Figure 的核心信号是 deployment KPI 与 manufacturing KPI:BMW Spartanburg 部署披露 11 个月、10-hour shifts Monday-Friday、90,000+ parts loaded、1,250+ runtime hours、contribution to 30,000+ BMW X3 vehicles;BotQ 披露 350+ Figure 03 delivered、cadence from 1/day to 1/hour、EOL first-pass yield >80%、battery-line first-pass yield 99.3%。这比普通 demo 更接近商业化证据,但仍缺 contract value、robot count by customer、客户确认 ROI/payback、repeat-order economics、intervention rate 和 gross margin。🟢/🟠
Unitree 的核心信号是低成本硬件和开发者可获得性:R1 from US$4,900、G1 from US$13.5K、H2 US$29,900,并在 H2 Plus / G1-D 页面披露 Jetson / Isaac / TeleOp / Sim / data workflow 相关配置。低价格会显著降低实验门槛,但不能自动证明 industrial deployment reliability、maintenance cost、gross margin 或 customer ROI。🟢/🟠
更好的读法不是问“谁赢了”,而是问:谁在证明 capacity,谁在证明 deployment,谁在证明 cost curve?下一阶段要看的,是这些曲线能否汇合成 S5:repeat paid deployment + customer ROI + low intervention + production economics + financial disclosure。
5. Approved public claims
Claim A — Tesla
Approved:
Tesla Optimus 的公开强信号是超大产能规划和垂直整合制造路径;它还不是外部客户经济性的公开证明。
Source anchor:
- Tesla Q1 2026 Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1 disclosed Fremont first-generation Optimus line designed for 1M robots/year and Texas second-generation line long-term designed annual capacity of 10M robots. Filed 2026-04-22. 🟢
Do not say:
Tesla 已经有 1M 或 10M 台 Optimus 年产量。
Use instead:
Tesla 披露的是 designed capacity / long-term designed annual capacity,不是 current production rate。
Claim B — Figure
Approved:
Figure 当前最强的公开证据是 named customer deployment KPI 和 manufacturing KPI;但还不能把这些 KPI 直接等同于完整 unit economics。
Source anchor:
- BMW deployment metrics: 10-hour shifts Monday-Friday, 90,000+ parts loaded, 1,250+ runtime hours, contribution to 30,000+ BMW X3 vehicles. Figure official post, 2025-11-19. 🟢
- BotQ production metrics: 350+ Figure 03 delivered, cadence from 1/day to 1/hour, EOL first-pass yield >80%, battery-line first-pass yield 99.3%, 9,000+ actuators. Figure official post, 2026-04-29. 🟢
Do not say:
Figure 已经证明大规模商业化经济性。
Use instead:
Figure 的 public deployment evidence 很强,但 S5 仍需要 repeat orders、customer ROI/payback、intervention rate、uptime 和 gross margin。
Claim C — Unitree
Approved:
Unitree 的强信号是 cost-access curve:低价格会扩大实验和开发者使用面,但低价本身不是 industrial reliability、customer ROI 或 gross margin proof。
Source anchor:
- Unitree R1 from US$4,900, G1 from US$13.5K, H2 US$29,900. Unitree official product pages, accessed 2026-06-10. 🟢
- Unitree H2 Plus / G1-D pages reference NVIDIA Jetson T5000, Isaac GR00T / TeleOp / Sim, and data / training workflows. Accessed 2026-06-10. 🟢
Do not say:
低价证明 Unitree 会赢。
Use instead:
低价降低实验门槛,但商业化还需要可靠性、维护成本、毛利率、deployment workflow 和客户回本。
6. Signal vs noise rules for this comparison
Signal
- Quantified designed capacity in filings or official financial updates. 🟢 Tesla Q1 2026 8-K.
- Named customer + quantified operating KPI: runtime hours, shift schedule, task count, production contribution. 🟢 Figure BMW post, 2025-11-19.
- Manufacturing KPI: delivered units, production cadence, first-pass yield, battery/actuator output. 🟢 Figure BotQ post, 2026-04-29.
- Transparent product pricing that changes experimentation cost. 🟢 Unitree product pages, accessed 2026-06-10.
- Future S5 signal: repeat paid deployment, customer-confirmed ROI/payback, low intervention rate, actual output/yield, revenue and gross margin. 🟢 if filing/customer/company-confirmed.
Noise unless upgraded
- Demo video without task definition, reset count, runtime, intervention rate, or customer context. 🟠/🔴
- Designed capacity treated as actual output. 🟢 for stated capacity; 🟠 if interpreted as production.
- Customer logo without robot count, contract value, ROI/payback, or repeat-order evidence. 🟢/🟠
- Low price treated as proof of gross margin or reliability. 🟠
- AI-stack integration treated as generalized autonomy proof. 🟢 for integration claim; 🟠 for commercialization inference.
7. What would change our mind
Upgrade toward S5 if:
- Tesla discloses actual Optimus quarterly production output, line yield, internal factory task KPI, cost savings, or external paid deployment. 🟢/🟠
- Figure discloses repeat deployment across BMW / Catalyst / a third named customer with robot count, uptime/intervention, and customer-confirmed ROI/payback. 🟢/🟠
- Unitree discloses humanoid shipment volume, industrial customer KPI, uptime, support cost, gross margin, warranty / maintenance cost, or repeat orders. 🟢/🟠
Downgrade if:
- Tesla capacity plans slip without output, task KPI, or external customer evidence. 🟢/🟠
- Figure deployments remain one-off and economics stay undisclosed after repeated customer announcements. 🟢/🟠
- Unitree low-cost hardware expands demos but does not convert into reliable paid deployments or creates support / warranty burden. 🟠
8. Common misconceptions
-
“Tesla 产能最大,所以商业化最确定。”
- Correction: designed capacity is S4 infrastructure evidence, not actual output, customer ROI, robot revenue, or margin. 🟢/🟠
-
“Figure 有 BMW KPI,所以已经 S5。”
- Correction: BMW KPI is strong deployment evidence, but not contract economics, robot count by customer, customer-confirmed ROI, repeat order, or margin. 🟢/🟠
-
“Unitree 低价会自动 commoditize 全行业。”
- Correction: low price may reduce experiment cost and pressure hardware ASP, but industrial reliability, software/data, service cost, and gross margin still decide value capture. 🟠
-
“三家公司应该直接按 market share / winner 排名。”
- Correction: as of 2026-06-11, the public evidence is not mature enough for a clean market-share race; it is better treated as three evidence curves. 🟠 synthesis.
9. Think Deeper questions
- If Tesla first deploys Optimus inside its own factories, should commercialization be measured by internal cost savings, external robot revenue, or both?
- Which Figure metric would most quickly upgrade S4 to S5: repeat orders, uptime/intervention, customer ROI/payback, or gross margin?
- Does Unitree's low-cost platform shift value away from humanoid bodies toward software/data/services, or simply accelerate hardware commoditization?
- In humanoid robotics, which curve usually leads the investable cycle: cost-access, production yield, deployment KPI, or customer ROI?
- What evidence is easiest for public markets to overprice before S5: Tesla capacity, Figure customer logos, Unitree low price, or viral demo quality?
10. Source list
Primary / official sources:
- Tesla Q1 2026 Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, filed 2026-04-22: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000162828026026551/exhibit991.htm 🟢 Used for Fremont 1M robots/year designed line and Texas 10M robots/year long-term designed capacity.
- Tesla Q4 2025 Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, filed 2026-01-28. 🟢 Used in related claim map for Gen 3 / mass-production-oriented design context.
- Figure official post, “F.02 Contributed to the Production of 30,000 Cars at BMW”, 2025-11-19: https://www.figure.ai/news/production-at-bmw 🟢 Used for BMW deployment KPI.
- Figure official post, “Ramping Figure 03 Production”, 2026-04-29: https://www.figure.ai/news/ramping-figure-03-production 🟢 Used for BotQ manufacturing metrics.
- Figure official post, “Figure Signs Agreement with Catalyst Brands to Scale Humanoid Operations”, 2026-05-26. 🟢 for announcement; 🟠 for economics because robot count, contract value, ROI/payback, and margin are undisclosed.
- Unitree R1 product page: https://www.unitree.com/R1 🟢 Accessed 2026-06-10; used for R1 price.
- Unitree G1 product page: https://www.unitree.com/g1/ 🟢 Accessed 2026-06-10; used for G1 price.
- Unitree H2 product page: https://www.unitree.com/H2 🟢 Accessed 2026-06-10; used for H2 price.
- Unitree H2 Plus and G1-D official product pages. 🟢 Accessed 2026-06-10; used for Jetson / Isaac / TeleOp / Sim / data-training references.
Internal synthesis sources:
knowledge/robotics-tesla-figure-unitree-slide-evidence-v1.md🟠 synthesis artifact, dated 2026-06-11.knowledge/robotics-oem-public-evidence-matrix-v1.md🟠 synthesis artifact, dated 2026-06-11.knowledge/robotics-public-claim-bank-v1.md🟠 synthesis artifact, dated 2026-06-11.
11. Public-safety check
Safe to publish if used as written:
- No Hugo private portfolio weights or private rationale.
- No buy / sell / hold language.
- No paid-report excerpts.
- No private-channel claims.
- Source grades and as-of dates included for material claims.
Do not publish:
- “Tesla / Figure / Unitree winner ranking.”
- “Tesla has 1M or 10M current Optimus annual production.”
- “Figure has proven scaled humanoid unit economics.”
- “Unitree low price proves reliability or margin.”
- Any trade recommendation or implication.